Dietary patterns have varied over time depending on the agricultural practices and the climatic, ecologic, cultural, and socio-economic factors, which determine available foods. At present, virtually all dietary patterns adequately satisfy or even exceed thenutritional needs of population groups. This is true except where socio-economic conditions limit the capacity to produce and purchase food or aberrant cultural practices restrict the choice of foods.
1. WHO/FAO. 1996. Preparation and Use of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation, Nicosia, Cyprus 1996. Nutrition Program, World Health Organization, Geneva. WHO/NUT/96.6.
A healthy diet can be attained in more than one way because of the variety of foods, which can be combined. It is thus difficult to define the ranges of intake for a specific food, which should be included in a given combination to comply with nutritional adequacy. In practice, the set of food combinations which is compatible with nutritional adequacy is restricted by the level of food production sustainable in a given ecologic and population setting. In addition, there are economic constraints, which limit food supply at household level. The development of food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) by the FAO and WHO (1) recognises this and focuses on the combination of foods that can meet nutrient requirements rather than on how each specific nutrient is provided in adequate amounts.
The first step in the process of setting dietary guidelines is defining the significant diet related public health problems in a community. Once these are defined, the adequacy of the diet is evaluated by comparing the information available on dietary intake with recommended nutrient intakes (RNIs). Nutrient intake goals under this situation are specific for a given ecologic setting, and their purpose is to promote overall health, control specific nutritional diseases (whether they are induced by an excess or deficiency of nutrient intake), and reduce the risk of diet-related multi-factorial diseases.
Dietary guidelines represent the practical way to reach the nutritional goals for a given population. They take into account the customary dietary pattern and indicate what aspects should be modified. They consider the ecologic setting, socioeconomic and cultural factors, and biologic and physical environment in which the population lives.
The alternative approach to defining nutritional adequacy of diets is based on the biochemical and physiologic basis of human nutritional requirements in health and disease. The quantitative definition of nutrient needs and its expression as RNIs have been important instruments of food and nutrition policy in many countries and have focused the attention of international bodies.
This nutrient-based approach has served many purposes but has not always fostered the establishment of nutritional and dietary priorities consistent with the broad public health priorities at the national and international levels. It has permitted a more precise definition of requirements for essential nutrients when establishing RNIs but unfortunately has often been narrowly focused, concentrating on the precise nutrient requirement amount and not on solving the nutritional problems of the world. In contrast to RNIs, FBDGs are based on the fact that people eat food, not nutrients.
As illustrated in this chapter, the notion of nutrient density is helpful for defining FBDGs and evaluating the adequacy of diets. In addition, they serve to educate the public through the mass media and provide a practical guide to selecting foods by defining dietary adequacy (1).
No comments:
Post a Comment